Have you noticed the steady increase in the cost of living in Australia? As political enthusiasts, it's essential to delve into the underlying reasons behind this concerning trend. The United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been at the forefront of several changes in Australia, especially in energy, transport, employment, and immigration policies. But are these changes really for the benefit of the people, or is there something more sinister at play?
The Australian landscape has been undergoing significant transformations, with the price of living skyrocketing, affecting the everyday Australian. It can be argued that these alterations are, in fact, negative, as they seem to favour corporate shareholders while putting the general population at a disadvantage. The narrative pushed by the United Nations regarding climate change has garnered attention globally. However, professionals in various fields have raised concerns about the authenticity of this narrative.
Many experts have highlighted that the emphasis on carbon emissions is not the real issue. Instead, there are growing apprehensions about the intrusion of corporate surveillance masked under environmental concerns.
Some argue that this push is a ploy to establish a one-world government where individuals are stripped of their power against authority.
As political enthusiasts, it's crucial to consider the implications of these changes on Australia's constitution. Despite clear provisions that forbid actions contrary to the constitution, there have been instances where the government has overstepped these boundaries. It raises questions about the extent to which these policies align with the fundamental laws that govern our nation.
The intertwining of immigration, renewable energy, and corporate policies has created a complex web that seems to squeeze the government into making decisions that may not always be in the best interest of the people.
The repercussions are evident in the rising cost of living that burdens everyday Australians while benefiting only a select few.
Have you ever questioned why Australia lacks a significant amount of exported manufactured goods, such as televisions, phones, clothing, and cars all being produced abroad?
This situation can be traced back to the 1974 Lima agreement which, although initially well-intentioned, has ultimately granted corporations the authority to shape policies that impact society as a whole. Initially conceived as a means of promoting industrial and commercial development in third world countries to bridge the gap with the rest of the world, this wealth distribution initiative involved the relocation of Australian industries overseas, the employment of local residents, and the implementation of an immigration program to bring individuals to Australia as consumers of these products, thereby facilitating wealth distribution.
Half a century later, the Davos agreement, which originated from the Lima agreement, continues to exert a significant global impact. This has enabled the World Economic Forum and the United Nations to promote global transformation, sometimes through orchestrated pandemics and other contrived global crises, such as false flag terror events, to create a backdrop for substantial change without substantiation.
Clear instances of this include the lack of a confirmed origin for Covid and the absence of evidence supporting humanity's impact on the Earth's atmospheric carbon levels, which has triggered a worldwide alarm and facilitated the implementation of unconstitutional monitoring systems like ULEZ cameras.
When examining the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it becomes apparent how they align with various radical movements endorsed by the liberal mainstream media and opposed by conservative individuals.
This connection serves as the root of numerous forms of abuse, including physical, verbal, and online harassment, as well as manipulation, brainwashing, gaslighting, and primarily bullying.
Indeed, these 17 SDGs are a significant factor contributing to bullying and the destabilization of governments globally. This destabilization could potentially lead to a takeover, as evidenced by the changing police uniforms on a global scale. Have you observed this trend?
They are targeting our Mining, Music, Textiles, Meat, Wool, Farms, Fisheries, Small Businesses, Land, Freedom, and Rights, among other things, placing financial strain on all Australians by employing illicit third-tier governments to enforce their plans on local communities.
A clear illustration of this is the imposition of restrictions on home and business construction, fees, rates, council charges, licenses, and insurances, which are entirely unjustified.
Due to lack of opposition or challenge, these corporations persist in collecting these payments, often ridiculing those who dare to question or oppose them.
In conclusion, The Australian government must be held accountable for its decisions that impact the livelihoods of its people. By understanding the intricacies of the United Nations' SDGs and how they influence our daily lives, we can strive for a more transparent and equitable future for all Australians.
Next time you see a rise in your bills or struggle with the increasing expenses, remember that there is more than meets the eye. Let's continue to question, analyze, and advocate for policies that truly serve the interests of the people, not just corporate entities.
Until next time friends.. Stay awake
Comments